Skip to main content

Shutdown in Myanmar: A Fresh Story with Old Challenges

 Supporting 5 million users in Myanmar is no small feat


When the Internet goes dark, so does communication with the rest of the world. We know that many regimes use Internet censorship as a method to suppress public awareness,  civil protest, and mobilization, and a shutdown event is often a signal of bad things to come. This means more bad news is lurking around.  When the lights of the routers went off in Myanmar, the whole world changed for millions of Burmese...

“Shocked and sheer disbelief” was how a young Burmese described the situation after the coup in February. “I lost my sense of direction,” and also “my job”. He was not the only person who experienced this level of dislocation: close to 2 million Burmese flocked to the Psiphon network in the span of only a few days.  The number subsequently increased to 5 million in the next couple of months. 


The graph below shows the number of Psiphon users between late January 2021 and late July, 2021.  Note the dramatic jumps in user count on Feb 3rd (coinciding with the coup) and on May 2nd, coinciding with the restart of mobile services. 


Both Psiphon and Psiphon pro were the top downloaded apps in Myanmar on May 17th, totalling over 1.7 million downloads (SensorTower.com).


The Cost of Restoring access to the International Internet 


A network of servers that can absorb such a huge increase in usage needs to have a solid infrastructure and a lot of reserved capacity for when people need access to the international Internet. But, how do these things work when censors block the Internet? 


Imagine the Internet as roads, and people surfing on the Internet as driving on these lanes. Some roads are local to a city while others can connect you to other parts of the country. Censorship is similar to disallowing traffic on national or local highways. It can be done in various ways from enforcing slow speeds to removing road signs on how to leave the city. 


That is when anti-censorship tools like Psiphon come into play and unblock the roads. Psiphon uses different tactics to connect people to the international Internet.


The Psiphon Network operates nine distinct protocols that connect people and deliver the censored content. These protocols, when run in the Psiphon Network proper, help distribute network load and ease congestion when people access the International Internet, which means a faster connection and a more reliable experience.

The flexibility that these custom Internet Freedom protocols give services like Psiphon, makes answering people’s calls in Myanmar, Belarus or Azerbaijan possible when Internet access is limited, but it comes at a real cost; every byte that traverses the Psiphon Network is crossing a series of commercial networks, and each charge their own price for the servers and network infrastructure.


Balancing need and costs


Making sure the network is ready to support millions of users, whenever it’s needed, remains one of the biggest challenges for the Internet Freedom community in their fight against censorship all over the world.  


As would be the case for any other freely accessible service provider, Psiphon cannot sustain the types of population scale surges seen in Myanmar indefinitely, nor support a number of these surges occurring simultaneously. This is truly unfortunate, since it could mean the loss of many people’s last hopes to access the open Internet, just when they need it most.  


After all, while Internet freedom is a fundamental human right, it is definitely not free.


Get Involved


Internet freedom is a right for all, but only a few of us have the means to support people in regions practicing censorship to access the open internet. Be one of them.


What can you do? Raise awareness by talking about the internet situation in Myanmar, and invite others to talk about it on social media with your friends and people who care about freedom of information. You can also directly support tools like Psiphon that help people in need. Subscribe to Psiphon if you are not in Myanmar. Showing your support for everyone who has been denied their right to access information on the internet will mean a lot to them, and it means a lot to the people who do their best to bring light into the darkness of censorship.

Popular posts from this blog

Why You Don't Need Google's Domain Fronting

Google’s removal of domain fronting emphasizes the need for solutions like Psiphon. Google has confirmed that they will block domain fronting across Google domains and App Engine. For many apps and publishers, this represents a step backwards in the fight for internet freedom. While Psiphon has never relied on this Google service, many app developers continued to depend on the practice as a convenient and straightforward means of circumventing state-level censorship, despite the long-running speculation that Google would close this loophole (eg. Will Scott’s blog post in 2017). While the announcement has been met with criticism from internet activists and service providers alike, Google has defended their decision, saying “ domain fronting has never been a supported feature ”. Domain fronting has been a popular means of censorship circumvention for several years, being embraced by popular apps like Signal, who publicly adopted the practice in 2016 . While using Google domain

Social Media and Internet Ban in Turkey

Following the detainment of 12 pro-Kurdish lawmakers from the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) in the early hours of November 4 th , Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, WhatsApp and Skype were blocked in Turkey . There were reports that Turk Telekom internet provider completely disabled access to the internet or throttled the connection to the point that it was impossible to connect. Despite lack of official decision about the restrictions, and BTK’s explanation that there was a technical problem throughout Turkey, Prime Minister Binali Yildirim made a statement later in the day and said “For security reasons, these kinds of measures can be taken time to time. These are temporary measures. Everything goes back to normal after the danger is eliminated.” Social media and internet bans ended the following evening in most of the country, but there were still some short-term connection problems during the weekend in some regions, and it was reported that some Turk Telekom users

Psiphon Usage Surges as Brazil Blocks WhatsApp

At 9PM ET on December 16th WhatsApp was blocked in Brazil . The ban came after a judge ordered that the messenger app be blocked for 48 hours when the company refused to hand over private user information related to a criminal case. For months, Brazilian telecommunications companies have been attempting to shut down WhatsApp because it provides free messaging and voice services. WhatsApp is the most popular messenger service in Brazil and telecoms blame it for luring millions away from paid cell phone use. Internet users in Brazil reacted strongly to the ban, criticizing the decision to block WhatsApp widely on social media. Millions turned to alternate messenger services and shared circumvention techniques over social media. Psiphon was praised by people in Brazil for being free, open source, and able to keep them connected throughout the blocking event. Psiphon’s surge capacity was able to cope with the increased demand, with peak data use of more than 8x that of a normal day. Psip